Showing posts with label biomedical research. Show all posts
Showing posts with label biomedical research. Show all posts

Friday, March 19, 2010


Legislator Spotlight: Rep. Michael Honda a Strong Advocate for the Biomedical Industry in California
Since 2001, Mike Honda has represented the 15th Congressional District of California in the U.S. House of Representatives. He is in his sixth year as chair of the Congressional Asian Pacific American Caucus and also serves on the Appropriations Committee, with postings on several subcommittees. Although born in California, Honda spent his early childhood with his family in an internment camp for Japanese Americans in Colorado during World War II. In addition to serving in the Peace Corps for two years in El Salvador, Honda earned bachelor's degrees in biological sciences and Spanish, and a master's degree in education from San Jose State University. Honda has been a science teacher, has served as a principal at two public schools, and conducted educational research at Stanford University. His political career has included stints on San Jose's Planning Commission, the San Jose Unified School Board, and the Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors. Honda also served in the California State Assembly from 1996 to 2000 before being elected to Congress. He is widowed with two grown children and three grandsons.

Honda has sleep apnea, a condition in which people stop breathing during sleep—sometimes hundreds of times during the night, and often for a minute or longer. With each episode, the brain rouses the person from sleep to resume breathing. The condition is quite common and affects more than 12 million Americans. Sleep apnea is linked to high blood pressure and other cardiovascular disease, memory problems, weight gain, impotency and headaches—as well as diminished motor skills caused by sleep deprivation. Left untreated, the disorder can be life-threatening.

Honda became aware of his condition when he participated in a sleep apnea study at
Stanford University. The study was part of a physical exam, which was required for his job on the Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors. The sleep apnea exam was supposed to last two nights, with Honda attached to electrodes to determine the quality and depth of his sleep state.

“My case was so pronounced,” Honda said, “that the technician barged in after four hours.” For the remainder of the evaluation, Honda slept with a continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) machine, developed by CHI member company
ResMed. The San Diego-based company develops, manufactures and markets products for a range of sleep-disordered breathing and other respiratory conditions. “After just four hours [on the CPAP], I woke up so rested and my mind was so clear,” he said; “the difference was profound.” For the first three days, he felt like a completely different person.

Honda’s experience with sleep apnea has changed his perspective on healthcare and the biomedical industry providing treatments to patients. Honda sits on the congressional committee funding the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and National Science Foundation (NSF) and serves as Chairman of the Congressional Asian Pacific American Caucus (CAPAC). In both roles, he has been a strong advocate of healthcare equity. On the appropriations committee he has consistently advocated for increased funding for Title VII diversity training programs and written report language aimed at increasing awareness about health equity issues. As Chairman of CAPAC, he has focused on health equity issues that particularly affect the AAPI community.

Click here to read the full profile on Congressman Mike Honda in the 2010 California Biomedical Industry Report.

Monday, October 12, 2009

California Healthcare Policy Forum Spotlight: Ian Morrison


In the run up to CHI’s annual California Healthcare Policy Forum, which this year, will take place on Nov. 5 at the Mark Hopkins InterContinental Hotel in San Francisco, I will be interviewing the various opinion leaders we will bring together to discuss California’s innovation economy, its place in the current healthcare debate, and how healthcare reform promises to change the provision of care in years to come. Ian Morrison, internationally known author, consultant, and futurist specializing in long-term forecasting and planning with particular emphasis on healthcare and the changing business environment, will be the moderator of the event and is the subject of my first interview. He combines research and consulting skills with an incisive Scottish wit to help public and private organizations plan their longer-term future and promises to deliver an impactful, interactive session among industry leaders, policy makers and academicians on the future of healthcare in America.

Registrations are still available for the event. Click here for more information.

Q: What will be the focus of this year’s California Healthcare Policy Forum?
A: It’s going to be a very interesting meeting. The focus is going to be on helping attendees get a handle on what healthcare reform means for CHI’s constituents, its members made up of leading biotechnology, medical device, diagnostics, and pharmaceutical companies, and public and private academic biomedical research organizations. Not just where healthcare reform is headed but what this means to innovators in California. On the one hand, healthcare reform is on the front page the New York Times everyday, but it also affects the day-to-day business of CHI’s members. This collection of leaders of industry is going to be able to give their views and my job as moderator will be to draw out those stories in an interactive setting.

Q: What do you feel participants will gain by attending the event?
A: Participants are going to get a cutting edge view of where we are in the debate from people with interesting perspectives on health policy and issues of innovation. On that first panel, we’ll be able to drive toward the “so what” for those in the innovation industry. Dr. David Gollaher, CHI’s president and CEO, will represent CHI members and what they are talking and thinking about. Dr. Alan Garber is a distinguished health policy expert, an economist and physician who specializes in the evaluation of medical technology. Dr. Sharon Levine is a physician at Kaiser, one of the senior leaders there responsible for thinking about public policy and the deployment of new technology so she’ll bring the perspective of what it’s like to be inside a large organization that makes decisions about the use of technology. And Michael Goldberg a leading venture capitalist, will talk about the effects of healthcare reform on the finance industry and ultimately, on the biomedical industry that relies so heavily on this type of investment. The panel will talk about such issues as the use of comparative effectiveness research, potential changes to reimbursement, the fact that more people will likely be covered at lower pricing and the resulting tremendous cost pressures moving forward. This panel will set up the conversations later in the day, which will feature CEOs from leading companies in the various sectors that make up the biomedical industry, giving them an opportunity to focus on what healthcare reform means to them and the various specifics they are concerned about.

Q: How do you see the provision of healthcare changing in the years to come? What part does innovation play in the new paradigm?
A: I’ve been an ongoing observer of the system for 30 years starting off by doing technology assessment. I think the environment going forward is going to challenge medical technology to deliver on the promise. It’s not just about “more is better” or “anything new is good.” That just won’t do in the future. Anything that is new in the future is going to have to demonstrate dramatically superior performance, meeting an unmet medical need where there really is nothing else available. One of the challenges I’ll pose to the group is why is it that in this industry, innovation means more expensive, where in every other industry, innovation means “better, faster, cheaper”? I think getting at the source of that is going to be an important contribution to this meeting.

Q: How must executives change their thinking in order to grow with the changing needs of the American consumer and/or the changing healthcare system?
A: I think executives need to gain clarity on what the goal is. The goal has been to find something novel that physicians can be persuaded to use. The hurdle is going to be much higher now. It’s going to be about delivering value in a much clearer way, relative to existing therapies in quality, outcomes and cost effectiveness.

Q: You mention in your writing the need for consumer education and the popularization of the concepts of how to improve the system in order to improve access and outcomes. How do you propose this to take place?
A: There’s a lot of misinformation. We are stuck in the notion that more is better and denial of anything is always bad. There is a real misunderstanding of how much healthcare costs and why. The basic problem is the average American household can’t afford the average cost of care. Everyone being subsidized by the richest 2 percent of Americans simply won’t work. So part of the collective education of consumers is the understanding that it’s expensive, costs are going up, the component elements of that are partly because of bad behavior on the part of the consumer, partly because of the high cost of care, partly because of the fragmented system providing care, and medical technology is one contributor to overall cost escalation. More judicious use of technology is a direction we’re likely to head in.

Q: What part of the California Healthcare Policy Forum are you most looking forward to?
A:
With this event, we’re going to have an opportunity to interact with some decision makers on the public policy side at the state and federal level that are active in medical technology related issues. This is going to be a tremendous chance for people to learn about the “so what” about healthcare reform for people in the innovation industry and I think it will be a discussion not just cheerleading innovation but really drilling down on the challenges and encouraging them to think about how we can evolve to better meet the needs of the American public.

Register now for the California Healthcare Policy Forum.

CHI-Advancing California biomedical research and innovation

Bookmark and Share